The fraud is the forecast
Michael Mauboussin was dissecting return on invested capital when he dropped a line that should be tattooed on every analyst's forehead: companies act like they're in a silo, that everybody else in the world is stupid. Only their company is mapping out a pathway to the future. The delusion runs deepest in growth projections. Analysts estimate earnings growth for individual companies by listening to management, studying the special sauce, calculating the TAM. Then someone does the arithmetic, adds up all those growth rates across the sector, and discovers the market would need to be three times the size of Earth's GDP to accommodate everyone's dreams.
What Aswath Damodaran calls the big market delusion. The macro story might be right; electric vehicles will dominate, AI will transform everything, China will grow forever, but that doesn't mean every company in the space deserves a high valuation. The error compounds when competitive responses get ignored. Companies model their future as if competitors will sit on their hands, as if pricing power is permanent, as if market share can only go up. It's like planning a war where only your side gets to shoot.
The Romans had a version of this problem. When grain subsidies started in 123 BC, nobody modeled what would happen when every politician discovered they could buy votes with bread. They assumed rational governance, careful fiscal management, occasional adjustments. Instead they got the ratchet effect, every attempted reform became the base for larger expansions. What started as subsidized grain became free grain, then free grain plus olive oil, then an imperial fleet dedicated to feeding Rome. No politician ever successfully repealed the dole. The beneficiaries organized, they voted, they made careers out of defending their bread. The constituency for fiscal discipline was diffuse and weak. You literally cannot take bread from people who are hungry, even if the bread is what made them hungry.
Nine families by age nine
Alice Schroeder captured a detail about Buffett's childhood that most biographies would miss: by age nine, he'd lived in nine different homes. His father Howard, a stockbroker turned congressman, kept uprooting the family. From Omaha to Washington, from rental to rental. The instability shaped everything. While other kids collected baseball cards, Warren collected cash. The money wasn't abstract to him. It was insurance against chaos, protection from the next move, the next upheaval.
This explains something most people get wrong about Buffett. They see the billions and assume greed. They see the compound returns and assume obsession with wealth. But read The Snowball: Warren Buffett and the Business of Life carefully and you'll find something else: a kid who learned early that everything except cash could disappear overnight. The folksy wisdom, the hamburgers and Cherry Coke, the decades in the same house in Omaha. It's all compensation for a childhood of perpetual motion.
Tim Ferriss articulated the adult version of this psychology on Shane Parrish's podcast. After working desperately to achieve financial stability, he said, it seems absurd to manufacture complicated strategies that add stress back into life. His friends all do it. Remove one source of anxiety, immediately invent three more. They can't help themselves. Shane offered his own example: cashing out his government pension when he left intelligence work. His accountant called it the worst financial decision possible. Shane called it the best psychological decision. If someone's coming to save you, you behave differently. He needed all the chips on the table, needed to know it was on him.
The mistake is thinking these are financial decisions. They're not. They're decisions about sleep, about temperament, about who you become under pressure. Warren's childhood taught him that lesson before he could spell compound interest. Some tuition gets paid early.
The margin of safety nobody takes
Frank Slotman has a principle that cuts against every instinct in modern business: to move quickly, narrow your focus. People resist this violently. They can tell you their top three priorities after some deliberation, but ask for just one and they freeze. It goes against our grain. We like to boil oceans. Teams are chronically unfocused, trying to optimize everything, attacking on all fronts. How to Get Rich: One of the World's Greatest Entrepreneurs Shares His Secrets makes the same point differently. Felix Dennis spent pages mocking entrepreneurs who chase five rabbits simultaneously and wonder why they're always hungry.
Joel Greenblatt understood this at the portfolio level. His margin of safety wasn't just about price. It was about concentration. While everyone else diversified away their returns, he'd run concentrated positions in situations he understood cold. Graham's margin of safety principle was about the price you pay versus the value you get. But there's another margin of safety: the one between what you think you can handle and what you actually attempt. Most people have this backwards. They take concentrated risks in their careers. One job, one city, one skill set. While diversifying their investments into irrelevance.
The real safety margin is behavioral. Nima Shayegh captured it perfectly: we all intellectually understand markets can decline fifty percent, but we don't want it to happen. Not because of the money. Because we don't trust ourselves to behave correctly when it does. In 2020 and 2021, everyone claimed to be long-term investors, eager to hold stocks for a decade. Then 2022 arrived and the same people liquidated everything. The margin of safety that matters isn't in your spreadsheet. It's in the gap between your self-image and your actual behavior under stress.
My Ledger — notes on investing, books, and things I'm still figuring out. The Library is where I keep the books that shaped how I think. The Journal is where I work through ideas in public.
Mandelbrot — the private toolbox behind the thinking.
Hit reply if something here sparked a thought. I read every response and always write back.
You just read issue #1 of Nauman ul Haq. You can also browse the full archives of this newsletter.