The man who wouldn't sell his skis
Sam Walton never paid five percent of sales for rent. That single line, buried in his autobiography, explains more about Walmart's dominance than any case study Harvard ever published. It wasn't a negotiating tactic. It was an identity. The man who built the world's largest retailer understood that cost structure is destiny, and that most people confuse revenue with survival.
On the Founders podcast, David Senra was reading about Daniel Ludwig, the shipping magnate who dominated American maritime commerce in the postwar decades. Ludwig was obsessed with eliminating costs. He squeezed pennies out of fuel, crews, maintenance. And he still lost. Aristotle Onassis and Stavros Niarchos, operating under flags of convenience, avoided U.S. taxes, regulations, and union wages entirely. They didn't out-execute Ludwig. They operated on a different cost curve. Ludwig's discipline was real, but it was discipline applied inside the wrong structure. He optimized the numerator while his competitors rewrote the denominator.
The investors who fail most spectacularly are usually the ones working hardest inside the wrong frame. They run better models, attend more conferences, hire sharper analysts. None of it matters if the underlying cost of being wrong is structural rather than analytical. Bogumil Baranowski, who co-hosts the Talking Billions podcast, has a phrase for the quieter version of this problem: he calls himself a value buyer and a growth holder. Buy cheap, then sit. The discipline isn't in the entry. It's in refusing to sell something that has migrated away from your original thesis but keeps compounding. Most investors bail precisely when the structure starts working in their favor, because the stock no longer "looks" like what they bought. They confuse their purchasing identity with their holding identity.
Sean Devine, who studies cognition and decision-making, pointed out on the Smart Friends podcast that identity has a half-life of roughly a decade, while expertise decays in months or years. The mismatch is where stubbornness lives. You still think of yourself as the person who buys cheap and sells at fair value long after the evidence has moved on. The Keyboard That Beat a Better Keyboard: Path Dependence and the Carry Paid on Open Doors is about exactly this kind of lock-in: early choices that calcify into identity, surviving well past the moment they were useful.
Thinking with your fingers
Robert Caro, the biographer who spent over a decade on a single volume about Lyndon Johnson, remembers a writing professor at Princeton telling him: "You're never going to achieve what you want to, Mr. Caro, if you don't stop thinking with your fingers." Caro was a young man then, banging out short stories at the last minute, mistaking speed for competence. The sentence hit him like a diagnosis.
Most people think with their fingers. In investing. In writing. In hiring. They move before the problem is clear, because motion feels like progress and stillness feels like cowardice. The entire architecture of modern work rewards visible effort: meetings held, emails sent, trades placed. Toby Lütke, the CEO of Shopify, once ran a script that deleted every recurring group meeting across the entire company, then emailed ten thousand employees to say he'd bought their day back. If they really needed the meeting, they could reinstate it. Most didn't. The meetings had existed because no one had the nerve to stop and ask whether they should.
Patrick O'Shaughnessy, on an episode of Invest Like the Best, asked investor Jeff Horing how he evaluates people when the outputs take years to materialize. Horing described what he calls the X factor test: remove the person from the equation and ask what would have happened without them. Would the deal still have been sourced? Would the decision still have been made? He said one of his best partners had a painfully slow start, made many mistakes, but the inputs were unmistakable. The way he thought about problems was right. He just needed time.
The courage required to wait, to let inputs compound before demanding outputs, is undervalued because it is invisible. Nobody gets promoted for what they chose not to do. Stillness Is the Key is built around this premise: that the space between stimulus and response is where the real work happens, and almost nobody wants to stay there long enough for it to matter.
The walkway you forgot you were standing on
Howard Marks, the co-founder of Oaktree Capital, has a metaphor he keeps returning to: the moving walkway at the airport. You step on, you walk at your normal pace, and you glide past everyone on solid ground. You feel fast. You feel fit. You forget the machine underneath.
For over a decade, declining interest rates were that walkway. They made it easy to run a business because the economy grew uninterrupted. Easy to enjoy asset appreciation because capital had nowhere else to go. Easy to lever investments because borrowing cost almost nothing. Easy to avoid default because refinancing was always available at a lower rate. Marks has been explicit that many business people and investors mistook the walkway for their own legs. The longest bull market in U.S. history made geniuses out of everyone who showed up.
What interests me is not the observation itself, which is almost obvious in retrospect, but the behavioral residue it leaves behind. People who built their careers, reputations, and self-image during the walkway era now face a world where borrowing costs are real, defaults are possible, and growth requires actual demand rather than financial engineering. The adjustment isn't intellectual. It's existential. You are being asked to accept that a meaningful fraction of what you thought was skill was actually environment. Nobody volunteers for that realization.
Taleb wrote in The Black Swan that almost everything in social life is produced by rare but consequential shocks, while almost everything studied about social life focuses on the normal. The bell curve, which he calls the Great Intellectual Fraud, makes us confident we've tamed uncertainty by ignoring the only events that matter. The walkway era was a long stretch of normal. People built models, careers, and entire firms on the assumption that normal was permanent. The rate environment wasn't a tail event. It was something more dangerous: a slow, invisible subsidy that looked like the baseline.
The hardest question in investing is never "what do I own?" It's "what's carrying me that I can't see?" Most people never ask. The walkway is always silent.
My Ledger — notes on investing, books, and things I'm still figuring out. The Library is where I keep the books that shaped how I think. The Journal is where I work through ideas in public.
Mandelbrot — the private toolbox behind the thinking.
Hit reply if something here sparked a thought. I read every response and always write back.
You just read issue #5 of Nauman ul Haq. You can also browse the full archives of this newsletter.